Sunday, May 29, 2011
Going on...
The accident tore my shirt and a little bit of my bag. My clothes and bag protected me well. I didn't wear a helmet, and thankfully my head was left untouched. My bike is having a tough time these days. Last sunday I had its servicing done, along with a few costly replacements which had been long overdue. Then the accident led to a few more costly repairs. And today I found it dead in the office-parking with a tyre-puncture. Let's hope everything else is fine.
My mom slipped on wet floor today and had a bad bruise on her hand, which had to be sutured. The sutures will be removed in a week or so.
Crazy things happening out here...
Friday, May 27, 2011
Nahi Lagi :P
Thanks a lot to the guy who lifted my fallen bike as I came to it walking from 20m away where I ended up after a smooth slide on the road. Thanks also to Ashish Masson who saw me in mess from a distance and came to help me figure out what was going on and accompanied me to my home.
And lastly, thanks my kismet. The effect of shani is not so strong afterall :P
Posted via m.livejournal.com.
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Back...
A quick update - my dad had a bypass surgery in march and has recovered well, i've resigned from suzlon and will be out it on 31st May, the world seems to be going as planned towards its end in 2012, am still a happy bachelor...
I tried to play a bit with the theme of this blog, and changing it deleted the looong list of books that I had read. I wish I had preserved that list somewhere, coz now I don't remember what books I've read :(. What a waste!
My last week in Suzlon has so far been one of the most heavily loaded weeks I've had here. I hope I'll have a memorable farewell party at the end of it!
Chalo then, see you again. Do visit this blog more often now, and read whatever I write. And please comment, and all your dreams will come true. Thanks!
Saturday, November 6, 2010
The 'Nasadiya' verse in the Rig Veda
Posted via m.livejournal.com.
Monday, November 1, 2010
Nishkaam Karma
Posted via m.livejournal.com.
Thursday, October 28, 2010
happy diwali
Posted via m.livejournal.com.
Saturday, October 23, 2010
First Mobile Post
Addicted to Opera Mini and Nimbuzz these days. I strongly recommend these two apps. They rock!
Posted via m.livejournal.com.
Sunday, August 8, 2010
Art
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Tu Hi Meri Shab Hai...
2nd runner up!
Play at full volume ;-)
Saturday, January 2, 2010
Creative Talent
To tap creative talent is one of the toughest challenges for Managers, who, for one, are themselves expected to be creative. The present systems are incapable of identifying creative people for jobs that need them. Consequently, even the present Managers are poor in the right creativity, since they too have been recruited from the same system. This calls for a huge flush & cleanse exercise in our organizations. (I believe it's needed for most systems in this world anyway).
Creative people
- May not have good communication skills. Very few do. It's natural, and true for all skills which are not our core competences.
- May not want to compete, even for what they are good at.
- May not be aggressive and assertive.
- May not have the so-called Leadership skills.
- May not have the same creative potential in every damn thing.
- May not get motivated with what the management sciences prove are best for satisfaction and productivity.
- May not think long term. May not want rewards. May not think profits. May not listen.
- May not have any desire to succeed or to rise in the organization.
- May not want greater responsibility.
- May have no interest in leading a team. May even hate people and team work.
...and so on... The point is, that it's foolish to expect people with creative potential to think and feel like others. And so the management principles, which appeal (questionably though) to normal minds, would definitely not work in case of most creative people. Coz on the one hand they are different, and on the other, they are different from each other, and with significant differences!
Creativity often seems to be one of the most misunderstood concepts. We often tend to associate it with artists without any strong basis. Perhaps, we tend to assume that all artists are like painters, the ones who imagine, interpret and depict stuff in new and beautiful ways. Someone who is adept at making your portrait if you sit in front may just be skillful, but not creative. Another example is photography. Nothing artistic and creative about it if it's just about clicking pictures, some of which turn out to have elements of creative difference by chance. A singer may not be creative. A composer is. One must judge creative potential of people from what they do, not from what they are.
One of the favorite questions asked in MICA Entrance interviews is 'What's the craziest thing you have ever done?' Another wrong notion - that creative people do crazy things, or rather things which ordinary mortals consider crazy. While this is really not true, such assumptions (many others besides this) kill the prospects of many deserving people entering MICA. The problem here, as I feel, is that of what we are conditioned to expect from people of a certain kind. For example, we would like to see creative people do crazy things. And we end up promoting crazy people, rather than creative people. Imagine, how big a disaster that is.
An analogy here is the way children are looked at by grown-ups. They are expected to be funny, cute and crazy - all that within bounds - besides being smart, intelligent and innocent, rather than what they actually are. Rather than giving importance to the fact that kids are real individuals with real personalities, thoughts, emotions and capabilities, parents burden them with expectations based on pleasant stereotypes.
Have any creative solutions to the creativity problem?
Friday, December 25, 2009
Random...
Randomness springs from a relatively structured root, whose parent ought to be even less random. I reached this conclusion after analyzing my own thought process. Behind all the random thoughts that I (or anybody) seem to have all the time, none of which lasts long or I can carry much ahead, I feel there must be a more structured framework of opinions, thoughts, ideas and instincts. Perhaps I skipped a few layers of randomness in between. But the point is that thoughts, like the universe, decrease in randomness as we move upwards towards their origin - the law of entropy as applied to thoughts. The external structure that we assign to what we speak or write is not really the structure of our thoughts. Nor do our thoughts emerge at such a slow rate. The spoken structure is a conscious alignment of desired thoughts which are retrieved in appropriate intervals and arranged in the right sequence so as to make sense as a whole, and with a specific direction.
The concept of energy was taught to me in the middle-school. It was introduced as capacity to do work, and the definition stayed at that even later. I always viewed the concepts of work and energy with skepticism (and I still do). I first expressed it when I was in the 11th standard, to some of my friends, but they didn't seem to bother. Just this morning, as I was jogging, I realized that defining energy as capacity to do work reflects how science and its perspectives emerge from our very human nature. (Are you wondering how?) It seems natural, of course, because we are human beings, and we have to think like humans. (What does it mean to not think like a human? Are there other ways of thinking? Are there limits to how or what we can think? If yes, is it possible to breach such limits by conscious effort?) And science, above all, is expected to solve human problems, explain phenomena in ways useful to us, create stuff to make human life easy. (Discover the truth, How & What God Thinketh... but think why we want to know that.) If there are bounds to who or what we work for, then are we not selfish? (Self here is an enhanced image of oneself, seen in association with all the entitites one relates himself/herself with, and to the extent he/she chooses to.) If yes, and I think the answer is yes, what does it mean to be not selfish?
Being selfish is not really considered bad by most people. Yet poeple are confused between the conflicting axioms of life taught to them, and the ones which drive their instincts. For example, the whole world thinks capitalism, each working for his/her own self-interest, would serve the interests of society the best. But then we are also taught tenets of team-work, cooperation etc., which, probably, are necessary to get things done in the first place - strong means for a great end, which has its importance and motivating ability only if one is selfish enough, which the concept of capitalism on top ensures. And the society sees progress, since both the means and ends achieve the best form within this framework. But such frameworks are for people devoid of feelings, emotions and desires. In real world, people are capable of, need to, want to and crave for love. But our institutions are designed for machines. Our formulas can't incorporate human power struggles - the strong, the weak and the shades of gray, the limits placed by cultural differences and natural (hate to use resources) endowments working together.
Furthermore, is society bigger than a human being? Is a country bigger than a human being? Is a culture more important than human life? Why should one be patriotic? why should there be inner (coz one is selfish beyond) bounds to selfishness? Love is certainly not the opposite of selfishness. But can someone truly Love and be Selfish at the same time?
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
PVR Cinemans, Lucknow
PVR Cinemans in the Sahara Ganj Mall at Lucknow has a serious serious problem. You cannot carry bags inside. Nor do they have any arrangement for keeping bags at any place in the mall, even outside the multiplex. I can't think of a more stupid way a multiplex can screw its sales, inspite of being located in the busiest shopping mall of a big city like Lucknow. The irony with this PVR is, that though it wants to attract the mall goers by offering them a movie experience along with shopping, nobody who does any shopping in the mall can watch a movie there, coz he won't be allowed to go inside with whatever he has purchased and he won't be allowed to keep anything anywhere in the mall either. Women are sometimes allowed to go inside with their handbags. I guess the definition of handbag is quite flexible, and who can argue with women about their bags! Men are not allowed to keep handbags. Men have pockets. Men have smaller things to keep. Men have fewer things to keep.
Me and my friend got pissed off last night when we were told we couldn't watch a movie there coz we had a small bag with us, which would have qualified as a handbag if my friend were a woman, and unfortunately, he was not. The bag had 2 cameras, and this was even more scary for the security guards at the entrance of PVR. They said taking a bag inside was out of question. And taking that with cameras even worse. Isn't that weird? X is not allowed. Y is more not allowed!
I got frustrated after trying to negotiate with the guards for some time, and gave up. Then went to the food court there and enjoyed my favorite Cheeze-Burst Pizza at 20% IIM discount at Dominos! I am really addicted to this Cheeze-Burst thing. I never liked pizza until I came to know you can do Cheeze-Burst and make it one of the tastist things on earth. I eat so much of it these days that Dominos people take my order with reluctance, mainly when I tell them I am IIM and ask them to give me the 20% discount that they offer to the others of my kind in Lucknow.
I have a history of interesting addictions like these. More on those some other time. Right now, I've got to rush for my Business Environment Class.
Monday, September 28, 2009
Movies
Today am going to talk about movies. Why do we watch movies? And what do we like to watch in movies? Please note that all views and thoughts here are mine. And all generalizations done here about people and mankind are either extrapolations of what I think/believe or are my assumptions/guesses, based on my fundas of the world. (It's funny, one declaration and you have licence to talk any crap!)
There are two schools of thought (there ought to be) on what movies are meant for. None of them exist as far as I know, and I don't know much anyway, more so in this area. But there must be 2 schools, coz they make sense to me. Here they are - (i)People watch movies to see their dreams, fantasies & nightmares in action. Now dreams, fantasies & nightmares can be good, bad, ugly, dirty, scary and whatnot. That's why we have myriad varieties of movies. (ii) People want to see reality in movies.
The second school of thought, I believe, is not true. It is actually an illusion people have in their minds, and comes from the (i) itself. People want to see their ideas and perceptions of reality live on screen. (Could have included this in (i) along with dreams, fantasies & nightmares. But chalta hai :P.) It gives them immense satisfaction and self-assurance. Works a great deal in boosting the self-esteem of any individual.
I think I have somehow answered both questions we started with - Why do we watch movies? And what do we like to watch in movies? Please comment to express your views on this topic. (I'll reply/respond with mine.) There is a lot of shit we can talk on this topic. I have not even scratched the surface properly.
Friday, September 25, 2009
the 'me' paradox
I often wonder whether we are right or wrong in dominating the earth the way we do, and in screwing the lives of most other animals of sizes comparable to ours. As we are also animals, and part of the same nature, perhaps we are also a force operating in taking the nature to a different configuration or a stage of evolution. As we gradually end most animals our size, through reluctant selfishness inspite of attempts (that are even more reluctant and compromised in their seriousness) to save these endangered animals from us, the earth is gradually moving to a place majorly inhabited by smaller species. At the micro level, they have been beyond our control and imagination anyways. And it is natural for us to want to be all powerful and dominating, if we can, in the ranges in which we thrive. So we ruthlessly cage animals, kill them, fake wanting to save them. May be we don't fake. It's genuine. But the rationale behind it is probably still selfish - perhaps many of us fear the death of these animals may somehow lead to our own death. Why? May be because - (a)we don't think we are responsible for their death. So somehow their dying signals to us that something's wrong and we might also die because of it; or (b)we know that we are responsible for their death, and it scares us big time that we committed a sin of ending life, of which we are also a kind. I am not sure what's the actual reason. May be it's a mix of both. May be it's something else. It's weird, we are not sure what goes on inside our minds when we do things, and what really makes us do them. The brain, if at all it takes all decisions, has various ways of doing that, some of which it does not reveal to the part of the brain which 'we' seem to be conscious of (are 'we' not our brains? minds?), the thoughts, beliefs, etc. that we are aware of. It's fairly complicated how something that is helping 'me' think ('me' is again defined by that something itself) hides a part of itself from that something, which it can't, so may be it hides itself from 'me', which it seems to me is that something itself. It's terribly complicated. God must be crazy!
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Have sex, Indian cricket team told
The Indian cricket team players has been asked to have more sex to increase their testosterone levels, and through that, increase their strength, aggressiveness and competitiveness. Click Here to read about it.
I am wondering whether this is good news for cricketers' wives or is something that scares them big time. Can't say how sex-deprived they are, but if they really are, then it's dream-come-true for them. But if they are not, and there could be various reasons why they may not be, then they will now have to bear some crazy fucking (ahm ahm, sorry, it's f*king). God have mercy on them!
But I don't think it is logical to assume that the cricketers will go and have sex only with their wives. Their testosterone is dedicated to the nation, and they shouldn't compromise on that if it takes unreasonably enormous amount of time and effort, because of various reasons, to reach and woo their wives. More so lately, because of the economic recession which must have rendered them unable to buy costly gifts and stuff. I am sure the wives would understand. But there's another angle to it. If any cricketer does not have sex in plenty with his wife now, she can charge him for one or both of the following 2 offences - (i)cheating on her, (ii)cheating the nation.
I must say that I intend no offence to cricketers' wives. I respect them, like I respect all women. I don't respect the cricketers though. They earn too much money and appreciation for doing nothing worthwhile. When I did more important nothings in TCS, GSSL and Satyam, I didn't earn even a measurable fraction of what the cricketers do. That's so unfair.
I've realized I occasionally write very long sentences these days. It's due to Amartya Sen. He's spoiling my english. Hey Amartya dada, I hope you read my blog. See what you have done.
I am sure my female readers (there are quite a few who say they read my blog occasionally) must be frowning like crazy reading my post about sex. It's a bad thing, ain't it? No. And it's not bad to talk about it either. The more openly we talk about it, the better. We Indians were all fine in our fundas on these matters before (say 1000 yrs back). The Britishers came, taught us all bull-shit stuff, Catholic fundas of sex is sin, weird English - which Amartya Sen is still not able to get rid of, killed our self-esteem and left us all screwed. Now the west has abandoned all that crap, is open, speaks simple English and chills out. And we are all confused ki bhai chal kya raha hai. Now imitating the west also isn't going to help, coz they picked up all the gyaan from us and adapted it to their cultures, and in the process messed it up. So we need an unlearning of everything they taught us and everything we learnt thereafter by aping them, and then apply our minds and do what's best for us. Each one of us needs to do this at an individual level and collectively it will take the shape of a culture. So the basic change has to come at the level of the attitude and perspective of every individual.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Cost-Cutting...
The UPA leaders are now obsessed with Economy Class Air Travel. Even cancelled some timepass trips, like the goodwill trip to greece. Also cut down on the the size of teams which accompany ministers in their forgein trips.
I think in addition to this, they should also look for other avenues of earning money, besides the government salary, so that they can pay more taxes and contribute positively. For example, in their spare time, they can each write a book criticizing some historical figure and hurt the sentiments of someone who can make enough noise when he cries. The book will sell like crazy. They can also work in movies, coz all of them are great actors already. There have been politicians who have acted in movies while being in office. So it's very much doable. Travel can be cut down by using technology. Afterall, it was cost-cutting that made private companies use video conferencing etc. So the government can do that as well. It's time our politicians got a bit entrepreneurial, and also made entrepreneurship easier and safe for those willing and daring.
One suggestion I have is to abandon projects like the Moon Mission and ask ISRO to focus on things which can add to our economic and social well-being. For example, an artifical satellite that does weather forecasting, remote sensing, spying, etc. is a useful investment. But a thing that goes away to Moon or Mars, rotates around it, and sends back images and videos of rocks and crap from there is a terrible waste of (taxpayer) money and talent for a poor country like India, and should hence be pursued through private investments.
I can think of some logical reasons for still doing them, however. Like, if we don't, we may miss out in terms of our capabilities and the learning curve in the long run. If we start our space program after becoming prosperous, when we will have nothing to worry about except the possibilities of life on Moon or Mars, we will then not be in a position strong enough to do anything significant, having lagged behind everyone in this race. But I am sure we can have innovative ways right now of continuing our research in the area, through simulation etc., while advancing more widely and more rapidly in other areas which make better sense, and drawing learnings through them and other means to enhance our knowledge about travelling into outer space. It's a matter of having the right will. Anyway we should be ashamed to give this justification for continuing with the space program, coz we never give the same importance and seriousness to education, health care, livelihood, safe drinking water, sanitation, skills, technology, infrastructure, etc., where we are already lagging behind most of the world. These things should be topmost in our priority list, rather than setting foot on moon. Later when we have time and money, we can launch ourselves into the dead parts of the universe, and search for life. Till then, I think we must value our own lives and those of the millions who are not getting enough or anything to eat. It's important to align the enthusiasm of our sceintists, politicians and intelligentia towards what the nation needs at the moment, particularly when it comes to policy decisions and ways of spending the taxpayer money. Anything that does not cause any positive impact on our well-being should not be funded by the taxpayer money. For all such activities, even if they are of high intellectual or scientific worth, seek private funding.
Monday, September 14, 2009
Economic Indicators
There is no positive news on the front page of Business Standard today. There is immense confusion right now about whether the economy is really recovering. Just like there was confusion for long in early 2008 about whether there was really a recession or the economy was just acting weird.
As all hopes are pinned on China to drive the recovery, India continues to feel great about its positive GDP growth figure, which, by the way, is a highly arbit figure, given the way it is calculated in India, and everywhere for that matter. The actual figure could be much higher. Similar is the case in India with WPI, the indicator for Inflation. The basket of goods it comprises includes stuff which nobody uses nowadays and excludes stuff that grab the major spending today. And we end up having a negative Inflation value. That's pretty silly. On top of that, the new WPI under consideration chooses to exclude mobile phones, coz it is based on some upgraded basket of goods at some point a few years back when mobile boom had not picked up. When everyone knows it's bogus, why not fix it? It would have been great if we had more accurate measures to judge the economy. That would have helped us take better policy decisions. Economies are not supposed to be run by trial and error. It's no better if the tools you use are visibly erroneous.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Three
I have an essay-writing competition today in some time... Perhaps my last chance in life to participate in such a thing. MBA has given me a chance to do a lot of things whose skope I thought had ended in 2004. And interestingly, it has not put a pause on any of the fun that I had as a salaried person. Am having more of all that fun, and with a more relaxed mood. But it's going to end soon. I am gonna graduate on 13th April 2010, unless I flunk in a few of the 10 credits remaining to pass (i.e., out of the 36.5 credits + Summer Internship that together make the kickass PGDM from IIML).
I have 2 main worries now. The first - of getting back to doing jobs after MBA. Well, the very reason I came to do MBA was that I hated my job. The 4 years of work-ex that I proudly show on my CV are 4 years of frustration, job-hopping, hating my work, gazillion lines of instant-messaging, blogging, reading TOI and ET online, and barely a hundred lines of java code (well, perhaps a little more than that... I have a habit of understating my achievements ;-)). It's the same for most people who go on adding number-of-years to their work-ex hoping to get into ISB or some IIM which now gives weightage to work-ex too (and forgives your low CAT scores which keep getting more and more pathetic as you grow older and older), or some of the executive MBA programs which teach old and hence slower minds what's what in less time and more cost.
NB - if you are a recruiter and reading all this stuff trying to investigate about me, lemme tell you that I am just trying to be funny here. I have really done all that you can see listed on my CV under "Professional Experience". Stuff like "Led a Team", "Client Impressed", "Conceptualized", "Pioneered", "Spearheaded" etc. etc., and everything in bold or italics, and even my hobbies and interests - all that is true. This blog is about my personal life, don't poke your nose into it. It is meant to impress girls ;-). So you don't worry about it and rest assured about the truth of the CV (It has been verified 100 times by IIM people; so it's all genuine stuff!). Go check my linked in profile, which has my CV copy-pasted. Some points are under different headings, but you will find all the points over there for sure. Also a few people have recommended me there, very honestly. (I did return the favor to some of them by writing honest recommendations for them also).
And the second worry - of getting married. Am not sure whether that's the right thing to do. No one who is married seems very upbeat about it. Besides it is very hard to find a beautiful, gult, brahmin, veginaatlu, 5'3"-5'8", well-qualified, homely girl from a good (middle-class) family who also likes a guy who is bald (the hair is probably coming back, I swear; I may get a transplant too if I get a decent job somehow), pot-bellied-but-getting-thin-coz-he-jogs, confused, 6-pointer-approaching-5 (ok, CG is not important, I know :P), etc. etc. (you don't need more details here... can't trust those recruiters... anyway it's girls' problem, let them figure out on their own).
It's almost time for the essay competition. It's about love being the hope and hatred being hopeless... something like that. I have to write about how love is the ultimate reconcilliation to all the world's problems and blunders. It's something the United Nations is promoting for fixing the world. The essay competition is being conducted jointly by the UN and Swami Ramchandra Mission, that is adjacent to IIML. They say they will judge our essays based on our 'spiritual quotient'. Wonder what that is. Frankly, I don't think just love can solve world's problems, because we cannot have such ultimate all-pervading love in this world, which has place for other feelings as well. Love cannot be there without hatred. But I guess I am still gonna go and write that love is the answer to everything. Need to win this one, my last essay competition. Will fake some "spiritual quotient". See ya soon!
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Gone Behosh
About 8 months back, I fell down unconscious a couple of hours after donating blood, and skipping lunch thereafter. I thought the banana, the apple and the muffin along with coffee, that were given to me after the donation would suffice for lunch, but I was wrong.
It was an interesting experience nonetheless. I was in the men's room when everything went dark and I fell. The last thing I remember of what happened before I was lost, is that my head hit against the wall. My eyes opened again about 5 minutes later. Not sure of this duration, coz I didn't check times before and after. Was too confused over whatever was happening, coz my alerness, mental state, brain responsiveness were far from their best.
I opened my eyes and stared at the ceiling. Realized in a few seconds that I was down in the toilet. Started wondering for a while as to how I could fall asleep on the floor of such a place. Then tried to recall what had happened, felt a slight pain at the back of my head, and I got scared with the realization that I had fallen unconscious. I immediately got up, though with difficulty. My vision was still blurred. I walked to my room about 30 metres away. Immediately called up Fauji Dhaba and ordered 2 Aaloo Parathas and continued with the movie I had been watching before I went to the toilet - Kungfu Panda (a great movie, I do remember quite a bit of it). I was feeling incredibly great at having had such an experience. I then went ahead and broadcasted through my instant messenger status that I had gone behosh, claimed after some time of having had a Near Death Experience, just to gain some publicity and sympathy. But the world was too busy to show sympathy of any kind :-(. I also went on and got busy doing something.
Friday, September 11, 2009
Back...
I am back in IIM after a 5-day log vacation at my hometown in Bilaspur. All I did during the holidays was to eat and sleep. Need to start working out to get into some decent shape. Jogging, which I did a lot the past 4 months, has not helped much. Or may be I didnn't stress myself enough.
Bought a book, which I had planned to finish reading during the vacation, but barely managed to start. It's The Idea of Justice by Amartya Sen. The topic is quite interesting, but Amartya Sen's style of writing sucks big time. Each of his sentences runs 5-6 lines of printed text - so long that when you end the sentence you forget the beginning, and almost 80% of it in my case. Many times, when I finish a sentence and try to think what is being said, I go blank for a while, a long one at times. I wish Amartya Sen wrote in English that is more contemporary and simple, one almost like the spoken form of the Language. But I am sure he takes pride in his ability to write in such English, of whatever style that is (Victorian?) and hates the current simple style. Can guess that from his hatred for the reply "Good" for "How are you?", rather than "Fine". Incidentally, and interestingly, I too at times find "Good" quite weird, having been taught by Anglo-Indian ma'ams and sirs. But have now understood well that "Good" is the contemporary, American way and you better use it if you want to sound normal. I do sometimes use it now, though with noticeable reluctance. I still prefer "Fine" though. That's why I don't blame Amartya Sen for sticking to his old 6-line-long-sentences-wala English.
I've read 75 pages so far, of the 400-odd pages. Will finish it, no matter how painful it is to read it, and how little of it really gets into my head. Coz starting a book and not finishing it is very very frustrating (for a book-lover). Can you notice analogies with something else? ;-)
Short-Termism - Focus on Today at the cost of Tomorrow
"Strategies don't come out of a formally planned process. Most strategies tend to emerge, as people solve little problems and learn...
-
"Strategies don't come out of a formally planned process. Most strategies tend to emerge, as people solve little problems and learn...
-
Coming to Delhi is a dream come true to me. It took too long, but finally I am in Delhi, and I feel great. I am here for an 8-weeks Summer I...
-
The Common Admission Test (CAT) will now be a Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) . I totally support this move and am glad the IIMs did it. But i...