Let me attempt to present my views on the question I raised in my previous article.
I was trying in my mind to define Passion, and was easily lured into defining obsession instead. But soon realized that there ought to be a difference between the two. Without getting into the trap of referring dictionaries, let me choose what I mean by passion. I would define passion as a highly intense positive feeling or emotion for an activity, which can drive a person to dedicate all his/her energies into doing it in the best possible manner and which results in happiness of the order for which one can willingly choose to die.
Such true and genuine passions are rare, mainly because our upbringing tries to make of us individuals who can handle, to an extent, most of the basic stuff required for living in this world, and anyone who does one thing to an extreme degree, ignoring everything else, is seen as an abnormal being who must be penalized for his/her behavior. So, first and foremost, this belief must change, along with the development of institutions and systems that allow an individual to focus on his passion, and have the rest taken care of. The industrial revolution was a small step towards that, and consequently, we have had more people in the west, choosing and working in fields they strongly feel for, than in the east, where countries like India have had professions decided by castes which have been largely hereditary for the past 1000 years.
That explains the various perks and facilities most companies provide to their employees in their workplaces. And the company that gets it right, can get the best out of its employees, provided its employees are also doing the work they are passionate about. For example, I heard a few years back that google ensures there's food within 8 feet from each of its employees! Not sure whether that's true, but it certainly is one such perk. And google certainly used to hire extremely talented guys those days.
However, ensuring job-fit is not what a company's HR department or Talent Managers or Technical/non-Technical managers can do best. Job-fit not only means that the company gets the best out of an individual, but also that the individual enjoys doing the job, so much that he applies his mind and creativity to do it better and then, is motivated to get to the next level in that stream. Most well-educated individuals are equally capable of doing most kinds of jobs efficiently. And they can prove their skill well if their abilities are put to test. And I don't think the world really has many jobs so complex that an average human being can't do well enough with a little training. Given all this, I believe it is always only in the hands of the individual to choose his work in his/her area of passion. The world can only offer him the environment where he/she can pursue his/her passion in the best possible way, but can never ensure that he gets the work that he does best and also enjoys doing.
Which brings us to the next element of the puzzle of passion - Choice. Besides the context of our birth, our choices largely define what we experience in life. Our upbringing and education should therefore jointly involve the right elements to give us a strong belief that we should fearlessly and rationally choose what we want to and when we want to. Of course, they should also impart the values which would govern the nature of those choices and ensure that they are not harmful to the world.
So to summarize - our institutions, social setup and systems should be such that they take care of everything else if an individual wants to do one thing alone; and our upbringing and education should make us strong enough to make our choices and stand by them.
There has to be a lot more, and I would therefore like to invite your views. Please comment.