Saturday, August 10, 2013
The Loop
Saturday, May 25, 2013
Fixing Fixing Fixing!!!
Does one always play to win? - Consider this: The underlying assumption in every sports-viewer's mind is that each of the players in both teams is giving his/her best in all ways possible to make his/her team win. I find it absurd that one must consider this implicit even in the conventionally cleanest of the games. While drawing from what Adam Smith said long back, if each player plays best for himself/herself, the team as a whole does best, with survival of the fittest players in the team. However, the best of the players individually may not be good team-players, for example mutual rivalry between some can harm the team and even lead to losing overall. But again applying the Adam Smith logic to teams, the teams that would survive, will be those that have the best combination of talented players, individual efforts, team efforts and whatever it takes for a team to win or survive in a competitive environment where limited resources will allow only a certain number of teams to exist and participate in the show. The simple postulate of modern economics and the science of evolution leads to unimaginable complexity as it applies to each level and layer, of which I mentioned only 2. But there is a basic flaw in the way we would ideally apply it to sports in the contemporary world and therefore assuming that each player up there is doing what is in the best interests of his/her career, his/her team and the sport he/she's part of. The flaw is in our understanding of the ultimate goal of the entire system. Sports at professional levels are not played for self-actualization or pleasure. They are played to make money. And if winning or playing well does not necessarily make as much money, then although the postulate of economics and evolution stands true, the operating model at each layer to reach the actual eventual goal is different from what we assume it to be. Now let us apply the postulate to the revised goal - a player who does his/her best in earning money through ways and means available to him/her (which may also include playing well) and also does things collectively with other players in the team, which help the team stay in a competitive position vis-a-vis other teams, such player succeeds. Now with the revision of the ultimate goal, it is impossible that players in a match are all playing to make their team win. Overall, they may be boosting the earnings of their team in the process of boosting their own. But with externalities like fixing money on offer very easily, the players do not necessarily earn best if the team goes on winning. And since the matches don't happen on another planet, externalities will come into play in whatever manner possible, coz they have their incentives too.
Then why do we blame these players for indulging in something that is in line with their professional goals? Just coz it is not in line with our foolish assumptions, which interestingly are so sticky, that I find it amusing how irrational we are in our thought processes. And this is true especially of sports, coz somehow we are not able to digest that this could be so rampant, while the same sort of fixing happens in the so called Reality Shows, and we don't complain, although it is much more understood there to all of us, and we even enjoy the spice that it adds.
One can argue that Fixing of matches is illegal, and therefore it is wrong. But again, legality of an action is based on where it stands vis-a-vis expected and accepted behavior. But if our expectations are foolish, why should law not be fixed by some wise individuals, who are supposed to have better understanding of right and wrong. But then, we are democratic on the surface and hard nuts on the inside - in other words screwed at both levels, coz we are eventually humans - and we are like that only :). An amazing fact is that we can fool ourselves by feeling real emotions by watching movies where people pretend and lie, i.e., act, and create situations that don't exist and may never possibly exist. Can we sue an Ekta Kapoor for bombarding a considerable chunk of educated Indian population with unrealistic family dramas full of lies, politics, murders, and also love and beauty, in the name Indian culture by manipulating the minds of innocent individuals in the way they perceive the world? Or should we sue Steven Spielberg for making a movie with Dinosaurs! We don't - coz we enjoy fiction and wild imagination. That's human. But we do try to draw a line by calling something too outrageous even for us to see, coz we do acknowledge that our minds are vulnerable.
But the case with sports is different. And I am surprised it is not the same with Reality Shows. We get entertained by matches because of the uncertainty of the outcome and the inherent action during the course of the match. The reason we are put off by fixing is that it sucks to know that the outcome of the match and even some of the events during the match we saw had been decided beforehand by someone, the element of reality in the action that stunned and inspired us may have been enacted, and it was all possibly a drama. We do enjoy movies, though, especially when we don't know the outcome. But with sports, our expectations are different. We expect universal uncertainty and genuine human effort, coz finally those are the very entertaining elements of sports. While for movies, it is much wider - the experience of emotions, the small bits that we relate to, the artistic appreciation, sexual appeal and the climax, which does not have to be uncertain to be likeable, but should rather appeal to our dreams or desires or sense of right-wrong or hormones or something else, coz there are many movies we can watch hundreds of times and like every time. I guess that's why they make reality shows so bitchy and sexy, so that we don't complain of fixing and just enjoy the show. In many ways IPL has tried to become like that and is becoming better at it. But it needs more masala to be a hit reality show, for people to look at it like one and also enjoy it like that. In parallel, views need to change, law needs to fix itself, some cleanup definitely needs to happen, and Arnab Goswami needs to calm down :). But then, he works for money too, and this is what earns him best these days! Consider this - when corruption is a hot topic, news channels gain if more and more leaders are corrupt and if they are able to break bigger and bigger scandals. Possibly some of them fix people too - reminds me of Zee News vs Naveen Jindal case.
We a kewl bunch of fewls!!!
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
The Sanjay Dutt Case
Saturday, November 17, 2012
Goa Trip Takeaways



Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Indian Culture on the Road
I think a great way to evaluate the culture of a Nation is to study how people behave on its roads. Look at India for example. The following, which I witness every day, characterize our behavior on roads in general:
- Extremely poor adherence to traffic rules is a characteristic of India on the streets. The unwritten and unacknowledged, yet all-pervading rules are the following:
- Totally ignore all traffic rules when there is no Traffic police watching
- No need to bother about the traffic signal if there is no traffic police around
- Leads to mass traffic signal violation and dangerously concentric traffic, which somehow escapes collisions
- The irony is that even those who want to follow traffic rules are forced to join the herd, otherwise they'll be crushed by the stampede of vehicles
- In case of heavy traffic, while everyone trying to push his/her way through invariably leads to a logjam, yet nobody gives way to anyone else
- Don't give way to anyone, even if it is an ambulance with its siren roaring loudly
- It is perfectly fine to stop your vehicle in the middle of the road even for trivial reasons without bothering you are blocking the traffic
- Narrow roads without exists and space for stopping is definitely one reason, but what's really alarming is the total insensitivity with which some people stop and don't bother for a long time
- If someone shouts at you, simply shout back, irrespective of whose mistake it is
- Honk as much as you can to make way for yourself
- Look down upon everyone else on the road especially those with smaller vehicles
- Believe in Me first, everyone else later, as far as possible
- If you hit someone, run away if you are sure you won't be caught
- If you are in a car, you don't need to worry if you are splashing water or dust on someone walking by the road-side
- If you are in a car, those on 2-wheelers and those on foot are a nuisance. If you are on a 2-wheeler, those on cycles and those on foot are a nuisance. If you are on a cycle or if you are on foot, everyone who is on a motor vehicle is a nuisance. If you are on foot, everyone who is on a vehicle of any sort is a nuisance.
- Lanes drawn on the roads are just for aesthetic appeal, and they are not meant for anything else
- It is sometimes fun to drive with one of those white lines running through the middle of your car
- And of course, the concept of lanes does not apply to a vehicle with less than 4 tires
- Taking random turns at will and assuming those behind will notice and apply brakes
- If you hit someone, fight with all your might but never accept your mistake
- If yours is a bigger vehicle, you can assume everyone else will give you way
- Honk often to clear the road and make way for yourself
- Tease girls and women on the roads
- ...
- ...
- ...
Herd Mentality
Friday, October 19, 2012
kuch to timepass comparison
Every bald man alive and dead has seen a moment when he came to know the schocking reality that he is on the road to baldness and has already covered half the distance without knowing and with the belief that he can't ever get bald. He still covers half of the remaining distance keeping himself in denial and covering bald patches with smart comb-work, which the world knows and notices, yet doesn't comment or does so with suppressed smiles and mildly sympathetic ayyayyos. This is the Sachin Tendulkar phase of baldness. And finally when the man decides he can't deny it any more and lets his strands loose, he realizes the world doesn't care and it knew all along of the barren islands which never erupt.
This sounds like the lifecycle of a bollywood star, especially a heroine, once in huge demand for her youth and beauty, and later thrown into oblivion once the first signs of aging appeared and Olay didn't help. Or a sports star who can no longer play well enough. Although the important difference is that a baldy was never paid for his hair while a heroine earned money for her beauty (and the sports guy for his ability to play the game well), I think the emotional states of both are still quite similar, particularly in the Sachin Tendulkar phase. And I guess the parallels end right there. Post that phase, a bald man usually regains confidence and does well with his life and work. But bollywood or sports celebrities go one of two routes - (1) get more and more frustrated sine die and finally die, i.e., enter a Rajesh Khanna phase, or (2) make a new beginning in a new avatar and create new goals with a new zeal, i.e., enter an Amitabh Bacchan phase. The main reason the parallels end is that for a bollywood or sports celebrity the cause of frustration was also work-related. For a baldy, it was only an appearance issue, and his appearance never earned him any money. I guess the differences are more obvious than the similarities, and I won't write more on this lame comparison :)
Meeting John Kuruvilla
A lot of coincidences happened together to lead me to a chance meeting with John Kuruvilla . I was at IMT Nagpur for a weekend to deliver a...
-
A lot of coincidences happened together to lead me to a chance meeting with John Kuruvilla . I was at IMT Nagpur for a weekend to deliver a...
-
Never before did I see a movie named after its villain. Yes, Ghajini is the name of the villain. Whatever the word means, I don't thin...
-
The Indian cricket team players has been asked to have more sex to increase their testosterone levels, and through that, increase their stre...